Join Our Email Updates

China Tax/Business News Flash 

 
Apr 2008, Issue 5
 

Expand All Collapse All

Please click on the links below to view more:
 
Administrative measures for assessment of high/new tech enterprises

One of the most attractive tax incentives provided under the new Corporate Income Tax Law ("CIT Law") is for high/new tech enterprises ("HNTEs") specifically supported by the State.  Such HNTEs are eligible to enjoy a reduced income tax of 15% as opposed to the standard tax rate of 25%.  For newly set up HNTEs in the special economic zones and Pudong in 2008, they may even enjoy a tax holiday.
       
The Detailed Implementation Regulations of the CIT Law ("DIR") issued in December 2007 only sets out the basic criteria and information for an enterprise to be qualified as HNTE, and defers the details to be formulated by the Ministry of Science and Technology ("MST"), Ministry of Finance ("MoF") and State Administration of Taxation ("SAT").
    
Finally, the three ministries have issued, after approval from the State Council, the "Administrative Measures for Assessment of High-New Tech Enterprises" ("Measures") and the "Catalogue of High/New Tech Domains Specifically Supported by the State" ("Catalogue") by way of a joint circular GuoKeFaHuo (2008) No.172, with retrospective effect to 1 January 2008.
     
The Measures mainly sets forth the allocation of rights and responsibilities among the three ministries, the detailed criteria for the assessment and application procedures, and penalty clauses resulting from withdrawal of the designation by the authorities.
     
We summarize below the key contents of the Measures as well as our observations for your reference.

How to qualify?

How to apply?

When to apply?

PwC observations
  • The Measures and Catalogue project an impression that the criteria for qualifying as HNTEs for the tax incentives are much higher than the same designation under the previous tax regime.  In addition, the application procedure is not perfunctory in light of higher level of authorities' supervision and approval (provincial or equivalent), more standardised requirements (the Catalogue), more examination on technical qualifications (by technical expert pools), more transparency (disclosure of qualified HNTEs), etc.  Companies should get themselves more prepared in the application process.      
             
  • The current requirements of the proprietary IP right of core technology seems to suggest that it is now less stringent to fulfil such requirements than the expectation originally reflected in the DIR.  However, it still has to wait and see whether the authorities would provide further clarifications or tighten up the requirements as the HNTE doctrine develops.
              
  • Up to now, only the Measures and the Catalogue have been issued.  Another very important document yet to be issued is the Assessment Guidelines which will make the whole HNTE doctrine closer to complete.  The Assessment Guidelines will reflect many details to explain the unclear terms, definitions, jargons, and also add more steps, obligations and requirements for the applicants.  It is advisable for companies to stay tune on this set of Assessment Guidelines.
            
  • It can be seen from the criteria that the emphasis is on continuous, sustainable R&D activities by HNTE even though the original IP could be purchased or licensed from outside parties.  In other words, enterprises which are just applying existing technologies to their manufactured products and services may no longer satisfy the new expectation of the State.
           
  • The HNTE doctrine demonstrates the goals which the State wants to achieve. However, the whole system is still under development.  Even if more clarifications are provided, there would still be some unclear and unanswered issues as this is a new system.  Also, it is not surprising to see in future that different interpretations or applications may be taken by the local authorities, at least at provincial level (or equivalent), as they may have different agenda than the State.
          
  • Under typical transfer pricing principles, companies owning technology should deserve to earn more profits.  Hence, where a Multinational Corporation ("MNC") is considering to having its Chinese subsidiaries to take advantage of the HNTE tax benefits by granting the IP rights of its technologies to China, then it may have to review their global profit alignment structure.
          
  • Many MNC's group structures in China currently comprise a number of manufacturing companies with mere application of technologies and a small-size R&D centre.  They may have to consider restructuring their China operations to take the full advantage of the HNTE's tax benefits.
         
  • The CIT Law and its DIR provide other tax incentives in relation to technologies, such as, the "Super-deduction" for R&D expenses, exemption for transfer of technology income, and sharing of R&D costs between related parties.  It is unclear how the HNTE criteria would interact with these other tax incentives.

We look forward to the Assessment Guidelines and, hopefully, further clarifications from the Chinese authorities.  We will share with you in future issues of PwC News Flash as soon as new information is available.

 
Get Your Copy Here
Download our China Tax/Business News Flash (Apr 2008, Issue 5) (pdf file, 170KB) for your reference.
    
Other Issues of China Tax/Business News Flash
Visit our Tax Library.



© 2008 PricewaterhouseCoopers. All rights reserved. PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.