International Arbitration Damages Study

View this page in: 简体中文

March 2024

In 2015 we first started looking at publicly available international arbitration awards to understand how claimants, respondents, and tribunals approach the assessment of damages in matters taken to international arbitration. We updated that research in 2017, and are now pleased to present this additional update, which covers awards from 1990 to 2022.

A consistent and continuing trend is the disparity between damages claims put forward by claimants and the corresponding damages calculations put forward by respondents. While this, in part, may be due to the nature of the claims in the sample (i.e. claims that have proceeded to a hearing and award stage rather than settling beforehand), it highlights the challenges for tribunals in reaching a final damages award when such a broad range is presented to them.

Contact us

Brian McGinley

Brian McGinley

Mainland China and Hong Kong Forensics Leader, PwC Hong Kong

Tel: +[852] 2289 1871

Luke Groth

Luke Groth

Partner, PwC Hong Kong

Tel: +[852] 2289 5061

Kelvin Cheong

Kelvin Cheong

Partner, PwC China

Tel: +[86] (755) 2182 3360

Jessie Wang

Jessie Wang

Partner, PwC China

Tel: +86 (10) 6533 7997

Quentina Zhao

Quentina Zhao

Partner, PwC China

Tel: +[86] (21) 2323 6601 / +[86] (755) 8261 8898

Antoinette Lau

Antoinette Lau

Partner, PwC China

Tel: +[86] (21) 2323 5533

Follow us